V.O.S. Selections is a wine and spirits importer. In May, the Court of International Trade ruled the Trump administration tariffs illegal and blocked enforcement with a permanent injunction. The administration appealed and an appellate court in August upheld the decision.

In August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a previous lower court ruling, but said Trump's tariffs could remain in place while the administration appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court’s decision regarding President Donald Trump’s ability to impose global tariffs will have massive implications for the international economy and the U.S. system of checks and balances.

"Is the new 10% tariff on imports from Canada related to the fentanyl emergency or the reciprocal trade emergency or are hurt feelings also now a national emergency?"

Most judges who have considered President Donald Trump’s disputed tariffs have ruled against him. But when the Supreme Court hears his appeal next week, it may be influenced by a forceful dissenting opinion that highlighted a 1981 case from the Iranian hostage crisis.

Yes, even when they are also regulations. Whether the Court agrees could determine the future of presidential power.

A bipartisan group of former judges warned the Supreme Court could dangerously alter the power dynamic between the three branches of government.

The court’s commitment to the so-called "major questions doctrine" will be tested next week when it hears arguments about President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

If the Trump administration wants to use tariffs to fight “persistent” goods trade imbalances, the right statute is Section 122 of the Trade Act, not the International Emergency Economic