But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals? On March 24, The Atlantic published a story stating one of its editors had been inadvertently added to a Signal group chat with senior ...

Damage control is not supposed to cause more damage, but that is what President Trump’s team has created with its reaction to the Signal leak story. As we all know, in the days before U.S ...

Social media users were quick to seize on to memes and jokes after The Atlantic's top editor was added to a national security group chat on Signal.

As senior officials deny wrongdoing, rank-and-file national-security personnel worry about the dangers if no one is held accountable.

This scandal is also fairly easy for the public to understand - people ... We can now bring you some reaction from House ...

The Trump administration’s Signal chat leak represents the "profound ... this leak is different due to the Trump administration’s reaction of "there was nothing to see here." ...

Nahal Toosi is POLITICO’s senior foreign affairs correspondent. She has reported on war, genocide and political chaos in a career that has taken her around the world. Her reported column, Compass, ...

Political fallout is mounting as some Republicans are breaking with the White House on the severity of the leak.

To the surprise of nobody who pays attention, it turns out that the entirety of the Trump administration lied about what was in that viral Signal chat. They lied to the public. They lied to Congress.

As the White House comes under fire for allegedly using Signal to discuss foreign policy plans, the encrypted messaging platform has now come into the spotlight.

Most Americans believe the Signal chat scandal that embroiled President Donald Trump’s administration is a major concern, polling shows. But, how does the public reaction compare with past scandals?